Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Court of Appeal Confirms Statutory Limitation Period Applicable to Securities Class Actions

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
November 26, 2018
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The Court of Appeal for Ontario considered the interaction between the limitation period in s. 138.14 of the OSA and s. 138.3(6) of the Ontario Securities Act (OSA), which provides that multiple misrepresentations may be considered, at the discretion of the court, to constitute a single misrepresentation. In Kaynes v BP, P.L.C., 2018 ONCA 337​, the appellant, a putative representative plaintiff in a class proceeding, sued on fourteen alleged misrepresentations. Eleven of the misrepresentations were made more than three years before the action was commenced. The Court confirmed that s. 138.14(1) is an “event triggered limitation period,” which commences on the making of an oral statement or the release of an impugned document. It is designed to run without regard to the plaintiff’s knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action.

The appellant argued that treating the alleged misrepresentations as a single misrepresentation would have the effect of extending the three-year limitation period for claims arising from the eleven out-of-time statements. The Court of Appeal disagreed and held that there is nothing in the language of s. 138.3(6) that suggests that it is intended to modify the clear event triggered limitation period provided in s. 138.14. Second, part of the balance struck by the three-year event driven limitation period was to protect subsequent shareholders from claims based on alleged misrepresentations made to previous shareholders. An interpretation of the OSA that considers only the “twin goals of investor protection and the deterrence of corporate misconduct” is too narrow.  Third, s. 138.3(6) was designed to protect issuers from multiple rights of action or multiple liability for essentially the same misrepresentation repeated on a number of occasions, and not to allow plaintiffs to sue on statute-barred misrepresentations. 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

New International Commercial Arbitration Statute for Ontario

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Sharma v Timminco, 2012 ONCA 107, Green v. CIBC, 2012 ONSC 3637, Silver v. Imax Corp., 2012 ONSC 4881 and Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc., 2012 ONSC 6083 (s.19, Other Acts, etc.)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Supreme Court of Canada Addresses Discoverability in New Brunswick’s Limitation of Actions Act

By Mark Evans and Ara Basmadjian

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site