Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Court of Appeal continues to discourage motions to strike brought under r. 21.01(1)(a) on a limitation issue, except in narrow circumstances

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
April 29, 2019
  • Discoverability
  • Motions to Strike
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Clark v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 311, the defendant attempted to bring a motion under rule 21.01(1)(a) on a limitation issue before it had filed its defence. The motion judge dismissed the motion to strike on the basis that the claim was time-barred, which was upheld on appeal. The Court of Appeal for Ontario reiterated its position that commencing a motion under r. 21.01(1)(a) on limitations matters is discouraged, except for very limited situations where pleadings are closed and the facts are not in dispute. Because the basic limitation period is premised on the discoverability rule, the application of which raises mixed questions of fact and law, there are very few circumstances in which a limitation issue under the Limitations Act, 2002, can properly be determined under r. 21.01(1)(a).

The Court referred to its decision in Kaynes v. BP, P.L.C., 2018 ONCA 337, as an example of a circumstance where the limitation issue could be determined under r. 21.01(1)(a). In that case, the limitation issue could be determined because (1) the parties were in agreement that there were no material facts in dispute, and (2) it was in the context of an event-triggered limitation period under the Securities Act, RSO 1990, c. S.5. The limitation period in that case began to run without regard to the plaintiff’s knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action, in contrast to the discovery-based limitation period under the Limitations Act.

Accordingly, only in very narrow situations will motions to strike under r. 21.01(1)(a) based on a limitation issue be permitted. The Court of Appeal held that “allowing the parties to have a complete factual record before the court prior to the determination of limitation defences is a matter of procedural fairness.”

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Discoverability

Lochner v. Toronto: Discovery does not require knowledge of liability

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability

A Limitation Period is Not Automatically Extended Until Professional Advice is Obtained

By Ara Basmadjian and Nicole Tzannidakis
  • Discoverability
  • Misnomer

No Due Diligence, No Problem: Ontario Court Applies Misnomer in Personal Injury Claim

By Ara Basmadjian

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site