Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Duchesne v. St. Denis, 2012 ONCA 699 (Discoverability, s. 5)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
May 27, 2013
  • Discoverability
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Duchesne v. St. Denis, 2012 ONCA 699, the Court of Appeal held that a claim is discoverable when the facts necessary for the claim are known; the legal effect of those facts is not a condition precedent to discovering the claim. The Court of Appeal confirmed that the absence of clear legal advice as to the identity of a particular proposed defendant is not sufficient to delay the running of the limitation period.  It is enough to have prima facie grounds to infer that the acts or omissions were caused by the party or parties identified.  The Court stated as follows: 

Both the Master and the Divisional Court erred in their interpretation of previous decisions of this court relative to whether knowledge of legal consequences that flow from known facts is required in order for actual knowledge to exist.  Such knowledge may assist in the acquisition of actual knowledge of a claim, but it is not a requirement. The appellant here could have had actual knowledge without having had the benefit of the legal analysis that might have identified for him the potential liability of various potential defendants.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Discoverability

No Duty on Insurers to Advise Insured of running Limitation Period

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability

The Discoverability Principle in the Context of Breach of Contract Requiring Third Party Satisfaction

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Supreme Court of Canada determines that limitation period contained in s. 36(4)(a)(i) of the Competition Act is subject to discoverability

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site