Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Family Law Act claims commenced under s. 61 are a separate cause of action in the context of personal injury litigation

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
June 7, 2019
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

When it comes to claims brought by family members pursuant to s. 61 of the Family Law Act, RSO 1990, c. F.3. (“FLA”), the latest word from an Ontario court indicates that the two year limitation period applies to those claims as separate causes of action. In Malik v. Nikbakht, 2019 ONSC 3118, the defendant appealed a Master’s order that permitted the plaintiff to amend the statement of claim to add a claim pursuant to s. 61 of the FLA after the expiry of the limitation period. Section 61 allows family members of a party injured or killed by the fault or neglect of another to recover pecuniary losses that flow from a family member’s death or injury. A claimant under this provision need not have their own direct claim in tort for damages in relation to the incident.

The Master allowed this amendment, notwithstanding that four years had passed since the motor vehicle accident giving rise to the litigation occurred. According to the Master, he was bound by the decision in Bazkur v. Coore, 2012 ONSC 3468. In Bazkur, the plaintiff had moved to amend the statement of claim (after expiry of the limitation period) to include a claim under the FLA. Ultimately, the amendments were allowed on the basis that they did not raise a new cause of action.

Justice Cavanagh overturned the Master’s decision, concluding that the decision in Bazkur was “plainly wrong.” He differentiated between what he saw as two different causes of action: one is the plaintiff’s cause of action in the original statement of claim, which was based on a breach of the duty of care owed to the plaintiff, and the other is the statutory cause of action in the proposed amendment, which was based on damages to the plaintiff’s children, caused by the fault or neglect of the defendant. Accordingly, even though the direct claim and the FLA derivative claim flow from the same acts or omissions, these claims arise as a result of different causes of action.

Co-authored by Natalie Tomaszczyk

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Amending Pleadings

Distinction between Adding a Party and Adding an Individual to the Factual Narrative

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Amending Pleadings

Leave to commence derivative action allowed where continuous breaches occurred under an agreement

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings

No Second Round in the Ring on Limitation Issue

By Ara Basmadjian

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site