Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Hopkin v. Kay: Tort claim for intrusion upon seclusion commenced within two years does not violate one year limitation period contained in PHIPA

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
February 24, 2015
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Hopkin v. Kay, 2015 ONCA 112,  the Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether the Personal Health Information Protection Act, S.O. 2004, c. 3, Sch. A (“PHIPA”) creates an exhaustive code that precludes an individual from bringing any common law claims in the Superior Court for invasion of privacy rights in relation to personal health information. In its analysis, the Court considered the differences between two potentially applicable limitation periods and whether the differences between them would undermine the PHIPAscheme. The applicable limitation period for a common law claim of invasion of privacy rights (i.e. a claim based on the tort of intrusion upon seclusion) is two years pursuant to the Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.24, whereas section 56(2)(a) of PHIPA provides for a one-year limitation period for initiating a complaint.

The Court of Appeal concluded that allowing a common law action to proceed in court would not undermine thePHIPA scheme because the Information and Privacy Commissioner is able to extend the one-year limitation period if satisfied that the extension would not cause prejudice to any person. Also, since damages claims under PHIPArequire separate proceedings, PHIPA claims are almost always brought to court well after the expiry of the one-year limitation period. For these reasons, among others, the Court concluded that launching a common law action for intrusion upon seclusion in the Superior Court, within the applicable two-year limitation period under theLimitations Act, 2002, would not be circumventing the one-year limitation period contained in PHIPA.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

A Statute-Barred Claim is Not a Provable Claim in Bankruptcy

By Ara Basmadjian
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Ontario Court of appeal resolves conflicting limitation periods between the Trustee Act and Limitations Act, 2002

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Shtaif v. Toronto Life Publishing, 2013 ONCA 405 (Limitation Period for “Recaptured” Libel Claims subject to limitation period contained in s. 6 of the Libel and Slander Act)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site