Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Joseph v Paramount Canada’s Wonderland, 2008 ONCA 469 (Special Circumstances)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
May 27, 2013
  • Special Circumstances
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Joseph v Paramount Canada’s Wonderland, 2008 ONCA 469, the Court of Appeal unanimously declared that the common law doctrine of special circumstances is no longer applicable under the new Limitations Act, 2002. The special circumstances doctrine gave judges discretion, where special circumstances could be proven, to extend a limitation period so long as it did not prejudice the other party.  The Court of Appeal reasoned that because limitation periods are designed to provide certainty to litigants, courts would no longer be permitted to extend limitation periods beyond the times prescribed by statute. 

For plaintiffs, this means that they must be diligent in bringing an action within two years of the date of discoverability. For defendants, this decision provides some certainty that the two year limitation period under the Act is truly two years and is not subject to the discretion of the courts.

Regard should be had to section 19 of the Limitations Act, 2002, which makes reference to limitation periods governed by statutes other than the Limitations Act, 2002.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Special Circumstances

Rajmohan v. Norman H. Solomon Family Trust, 2014 ONCA 352, Doctrine of Special Circumstances Not Applicable to a Third Party claim commenced after the expiration of a limitation period

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Special Circumstances

Doctrine of Special Circumstances still used to add parties after the expiration of a limitation period contained in the Trustee Act

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site