Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Ontario Court of Appeal sheds some light on the appropriateness of bringing a Rule 21 motion based on a Limitations Defence

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
October 12, 2017
  • Discoverability
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

​It has been held that limitation period questions are typically not appropriate for determination under Rule 21.01. Unless there are no material facts in dispute, a limitation period issue should normally be determined after the close of pleadings (as a limitation period is a defence which should be pleaded) and by way of motion for summary judgment or trial.  In Salewski v. Lalonde , 2017 ONCA 5115, the Court of Appeal for Ontario observed that as the discoverability issue is one of mixed fact and law, there may well be no circumstance “in which a limitation issue under the Act can properly be determined under rule 21.01(1)(a) unless pleadings are closed and it is clear that the facts are undisputed. Absent such circumstances, we are skeptical that any proposed limitation defence under the Act will involve ‘a question of law raised by a pleading’ as required under rule 21.01(1)(a).”

​In , the Court of Appeal for Ontario casts doubt on whether there is any circusmtance where Rule 21.01(1)(a) is appropriate for determining a limtiations issue, except where (1) pleadings have closed and (2) the facts are undisputed:

[45] However, the basic limitation period established by the Limitations Act, 2002 is now premised on the discoverability rule. The discoverability rule raises issues of mixed fact and law: Longo v. MacLaren Art Centre, 2014 ONCA 526 … at para. 38. We therefore question whether there is now any circumstance in which a limitation issue under the Act can properly be determined under rule 21.01(1)(a) unless pleadings are closed and it is clear that facts are undisputed. Absent such circumstances, we are sceptical that any proposed limitation defence under the Act will involve “a question of law raised by a pleading” as required under rule 21.01(1)(a).

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability

Landmark OCA decision on s. 18 of the Limitations Act, 2002

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability
  • Misnomer

No Obligation to Sue a John Doe or Jane Doe

By Ara Basmadjian and Barbara Grossman
  • Discoverability

Not applying the objective test under s. 5(1)(b) of the Limitations Act, 2002 amounts to a reviewable error, Court of Appeal finds

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site