Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons Logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Ontario Court of Appeal sheds some light on the appropriateness of bringing a Rule 21 motion based on a Limitations Defence

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
October 12, 2017
  • Discoverability
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

​It has been held that limitation period questions are typically not appropriate for determination under Rule 21.01. Unless there are no material facts in dispute, a limitation period issue should normally be determined after the close of pleadings (as a limitation period is a defence which should be pleaded) and by way of motion for summary judgment or trial.  In Salewski v. Lalonde , 2017 ONCA 5115, the Court of Appeal for Ontario observed that as the discoverability issue is one of mixed fact and law, there may well be no circumstance “in which a limitation issue under the Act can properly be determined under rule 21.01(1)(a) unless pleadings are closed and it is clear that the facts are undisputed. Absent such circumstances, we are skeptical that any proposed limitation defence under the Act will involve ‘a question of law raised by a pleading’ as required under rule 21.01(1)(a).”

​In , the Court of Appeal for Ontario casts doubt on whether there is any circusmtance where Rule 21.01(1)(a) is appropriate for determining a limtiations issue, except where (1) pleadings have closed and (2) the facts are undisputed:

[45] However, the basic limitation period established by the Limitations Act, 2002 is now premised on the discoverability rule. The discoverability rule raises issues of mixed fact and law: Longo v. MacLaren Art Centre, 2014 ONCA 526 … at para. 38. We therefore question whether there is now any circumstance in which a limitation issue under the Act can properly be determined under rule 21.01(1)(a) unless pleadings are closed and it is clear that facts are undisputed. Absent such circumstances, we are sceptical that any proposed limitation defence under the Act will involve “a question of law raised by a pleading” as required under rule 21.01(1)(a).

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability

Landmark OCA decision on s. 18 of the Limitations Act, 2002

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability

The Discoverability Principle in the Context of Breach of Contract Requiring Third Party Satisfaction

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability

Tarion Warranty Corporation and New Millennium Homes Inc., 2013 ONSC 4339 (discoverability of indemnity claim)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your organization by providing uniquely global and deeply local legal solutions. Polycentric, purpose-driven and committed to inclusion, diversity, equity and sustainability, we focus on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site