Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Ontario Superior Court of Justice Amends Issue Date of Statement of Claim after Failure of Duty by Court Staff

By Ara Basmadjian
September 15, 2021
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Patkaciunas v. Economical Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 ONSC 5945 (“Patkaciunas”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that it has “the necessary jurisdiction to treat a claim as having been commenced when the statement of claim ought to have been issued by the public official to whom it was presented for this purpose if doing so affects the application of a limitation period.”

Section 259.1 of the Insurance Act, RSO 1990, c I.8 establishes a one-year limitation period to commence a proceeding against an insurer under a contract for loss or damage to an automobile or its contents. The limitation period at issue in this case expired on June 25, 2019. The plaintiff’s paralegal was not aware of the process for issuing a claim online and therefore attended in person to the court office more than 30 minutes before closing on June 25, 2019. The court staff generally prioritize time-sensitive filings. The paralegal obtained a date and time stamped numbered ticket and waited for the court clerk to call on him. There was only one clerk working at the in-take office that day. When the paralegal’s ticket was called, the clerk told the paralegal that his computer was shutting down in 90 seconds and that the statement of claim would not be processed for issuance on that day. The clerk turned around and left. The statement of claim was issued the following day on June 26, 2019.

The plaintiff brought a motion for an order amending the claim to bear an issue date of June 25, 2019. The defendant, in turn, brought a motion for summary judgment on the basis that the claim was issued one day after expiry of the limitation period.

Justice Dunphy determined that the statement of claim ought to have been processed and issued on June 25, 2019:

[9]         The plaintiffs did not fail to commence a proceeding within the time limit prescribed by s. 259.1 of the Insurance Act, RSO 1990, c I.8. They did all that was necessary to commence a proceeding within the time prescribed. The court staff failed to record that fact. Staff ought to have confirmed that fact and provided evidence of it in the form of a properly dated stamp on the statement of claim to evidence its issuance.  

[10]      I have the inherent jurisdiction to treat as done that which public officials had a duty to do and when they had a duty to do it. I am declaring that the statement of claim was issued on June 25, 2019. I am not excusing the plaintiffs’ failure to take a step in the time prescribed – I am finding as a fact on the evidence before me that the step required was taken even if not recorded by the court as it ought to have been through no fault of the plaintiffs.

In the result, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion and dismissed the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The decision in Patkaciunas is a triumph of common sense and demonstrates in the case of limitation periods that while “[it] may be good policy for plaintiffs to leave a margin o[f] error for unexpected occurrences that lie within their own control – they are not required to anticipate failings by court staff over which they have no control.”  

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Ara Basmadjian

About Ara Basmadjian

Ara Basmadjian is a Partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group at Dentons Canada LLP. His practice involves a variety of complex corporate, commercial and civil litigation matters. Ara has particular experience in cases involving commercial contracts, negligence, product liability, class actions, competition law, cannabis in Canada, and extraordinary remedies, such as injunctions.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

OCA considers limitation period under s. 6(2) of the Arthur Wishart Act in respect of a Replacement Franchise Agreement

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Amending Pleadings

Divisional Court cautions that seeking declaratory relief is not a means to circumvent applicable limitation periods

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Special Circumstances

Rajmohan v. Norman H. Solomon Family Trust, 2014 ONCA 352, Doctrine of Special Circumstances Not Applicable to a Third Party claim commenced after the expiration of a limitation period

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site