Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Real Property Limitations Act applies to a claim for monies held in a resulting trust, where monies were used to purchase land

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
October 11, 2018
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Sinclair v. Harris, 2018 ONSC 5718, the Court considered whether a claim to recover monies that were loaned for the purpose of purchasing of land, and subsequently held in a resulting trust, is governed by the Real Property Limitations Act or whether no limitation period applies because it is governed by equity.

The plaintiffs brought a claim in favour of the Estate of Ms. Rock, the deceased, alleging that a resulting trust was established when the deceased loaned money to the defendants to purchase a property in Beeton, Ontario (the “Beeton Property”). The property was sold on August 5, 2003 by the defendants. The Estate Trustees sought re-payment of Ms. Rock’s equitable interest in the Beeton Property claiming that such funds were held by the defendants on a resulting trust in favour of Ms. Rock’s estate. The defendants argued that no such trust was formed; rather, that a contractual relationship was formed in which the money was given as consideration for shares in the defendants’ company. The defendants sought summary judgment on the basis that the plaintiffs’ claims were statute barred because they were brought outside the limitation period.

The court considered the applicable limitation period that applied to theresulting trust, which required a determination of the nature of the transaction. The plaintiffs argued that no limitation period applied to a resulting trust in equity; in particular, the claim was not about land but it was about the monies that Ms. Rock gave the defendants. However, the defendants submitted that the 10-year limitation period applied pursuant to s. 4 of theReal Property Limitations Act (which had since expired). 

The motions judge held that the RPLA cannot simply be avoided by an attempt to characterize the transaction as being about money and not land. The fact that the plaintiffs are not actually seeking the return of the Beeton Property does not avoid the application of s. 4 given what they are seeking is “money to be laid out in the purchase of land” which fits within the definition of “land” under the RPLA. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s claim was an action to recover land under s. 4 of the RPLA and the 10 year limitation period applied.

The motions judge found that at the latest, the right to recover the land accrued at the time that the Beeton Property was sold (in 2003) and Ms. Rock’s interest was not paid back to her. Since the claim was commenced in 2017 it was outside of the 10-year period. Thus, summary judgment was granted in the defendant’s favour on the basis that the plaintiffs action was statute barred.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Conde v Ripley: An action to set aside a conveyance of land under the Fraudulent Conveyance Act is subject to the ten year limitation period under the Real Property Limitation Act

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Court of Appeal Confirms Statutory Limitation Period Applicable to Securities Class Actions

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • COVID-19
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Ontario Suspends Limitation Periods

By Ara Basmadjian

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site