Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Relying on a limitations argument? The Ontario Court of Appeal confirms that this is a defence reserved only for a defendant

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
June 17, 2018
  • Adding a Party
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Abrahamovitz v. Berens, 2018 ONCA 252, the Court of Appeal for Ontario allowed a motion that added a party to an action where the limitation period under s.4 of the Limitations Act, 2002 had expired.

The plaintiffs were shareholders in a holding company that owned a commercial real estate property. In September 2011, they began an action to recover a portion of the property’s revenue held back by one of the defendants, Megapro Property Management Ltd. Megapro held back these revenues due to a claim by the estate of a deceased former property manager. The estate was initially not a party to the action. The estate based its claim on acknowledgements allegedly signed by the respondents that provided the property manager with an interest in a portion of the respondents’ annual income from the property. 

In June 2016, the defendants brought a motion for an order to add the estate as a party to the action so that it could assert an interest in the disputed funds. The plaintiffs argued that the estate’s claim crystalized in August 2010 when the estate first discovered its entitlement to a share of the respondent’s income, and therefore the defendant’s motion was statute barred. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice agreed and held that the estate’s claim was statute barred pursuant to s.4 of the Act. 

In allowing the appeal, Justice Feldman held that s.22 of the Act codifies that the choice to plead a limitations defence rests with the defendant. In this case, it was the plaintiffs, not the defendants, who had raised the limitations defence. Accordingly, the Court recognized that the defendants’ conduct in moving to add the estate to the action clearly was not indicative of relying on a limitations defence. The Court of Appeal reiterated the proposition that “the expiry of a limitation period does not render a cause of action a nullity; rather, it is a defence that must be pleaded”. Since the defendants had not pleaded a limitations defence, the estate’s claim to assert an interest in the funds had not expired.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Adding a Party

OCA addresses evidentiary burden of proving that plaintiff did not act with due diligence in order to rely on a limitations defence

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Adding a Party

Adding a Party – Discoverability versus Due Diligence

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings

No Second Round in the Ring on Limitation Issue

By Ara Basmadjian

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site