Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Sandro Steel Fabrication Ltd. v Chiesa, 2013 ONSC 658 (s. 11, Attempted Resolutions)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
May 30, 2013
  • Attempted Resolution
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

**THIS DECISION OF JUSTICE KOKE WAS AFFIRMED BY THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL ON JUNE 21, 2013, BUT THE COURT OF APPEAL DID NOT ENDORSE HOW BROADLY KOKE J. INTERPRETED SECTION 11(1). PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR BLOG POST OF THE COURT OF APPEAL’S DECISION**

In Sandro Steel Fabrication Ltd. v. Chisea, 2013 ONSC 658, Justice Koke held that a mediation agreement stops a limitation period from running by virtue of section 11 of the Limitations Act, 2002.  That section provides that if a person with a claim and a person against whom the claim is made agree to have an independent third party resolve the claim or assist them in resolving it, the basic and ultimate limitation periods provided for in the Act are suspended as of the date the parties enter into the agreement.

The Court held that section 11 should be given a broad interpretation as its purpose is to encourage settlement. The Court explained that even in circumstances where there is ambiguity as to what issues are to be addressed in the mediation, section 11(1) should operate to suspend the running of the applicable limitation period, otherwise plaintiffs may be reluctant to engage in a mediation process.  Furthermore, an agreement to mediate need not express that the limitation period is suspended until the conclusion of the mediation.  Rather, all that is required to engage section 11 is an agreement between the parties to have an independent third party resolve the claim or assist them in resolving it.

The Court distinguished section 11 of the Act from section 22(3).  The latter refers to an agreement which parties may enter into whereby the limitation period “may be suspended or extended”.  The former does not refer to an agreement to suspend or extend a limitation period, rather it refers to an agreement whereby parties “agree to have an independent third party resolve the claim or assist them in resolving it”. 

It should be noted that the ability of sections 11 and 22(3) to suspend or extend a limitation period only applies to limitation periods under the Act and not those limitation periods which are contained in other legislation referred to in the Schedule to the Act.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Attempted Resolution
  • Discoverability
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements

Hamilton (City) v. Metcalfe & Mansfield Capital Corp., 2012 ONCA 156 (Discoverability and Tolling Agreements)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Attempted Resolution

Sandro Steel Fabrication Ltd. v. Chisea, 2013 ONCA 434 (s. 11, Attempted Resolutions)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Attempted Resolution

Toronto Standard Condominium Corp. No. 1789 v. Tip Top Lofts Development Inc., 2011 ONSC 7181 (s. 11, Attempted Resolutions)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site