Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

Waterloo Region District School Board v CRD Construction, 2010 ONCA 838 (Contribution and Indemnity, s. 18)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
May 24, 2013
  • Contribution and Indemnity
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Waterloo Region District School Board v CRD Construction, 2010 ONCA 838, a five member panel of the Court of Appeal confirmed that a claim for contribution and indemnity, whether in tort or otherwise, now has a two-year limitation period. This period is presumed to run from the date when the person who seeks contribution and indemnity is served with the plaintiff’s claim that gives rise to the claim (and not the date in which the plaintiff files the claim, although the two may be the same). The Court of Appeal concluded that this “is the only limitation period in the Act that applies to claims for contribution and indemnity.”

Accordingly, the limitation period for contribution and indemnity is separate from the plaintiff’s limitation period.  This case is particularly beneficial to defendants in cases where a plaintiff failed to name a party who may be liable for the damages being claimed. 

For a more fulsome summary of the case see Christina Porretta, “Court Rules that Claim for Contribution and Indemnity has Two-Year Limitation Period”, International Law Office (Online: January 25, 2011)​

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons Limitations Law Group

The Limitations Law Blog contains summaries of the latest developments arising from appellate and lower court decisions on limitations law in Ontario. Subscribe today and be one of the first to receive our insights on recent limitations law developments in Ontario.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Contribution and Indemnity

Canaccord Capital Corp. v. Roscoe, 2013 ONCA 378 (Contractual Indemnity Subject to Limitation Period under s. 18)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability

Limitation period for contribution and indemnity begins to run when defendant served with claim, even if defendant had prior knowledge of the claim

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability

Demide v. AG of Canada, 2015 ONSC 3000, Superior Court renders conflicting decision with respect to discoverability of claims for contribution and indemnity

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site