Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Limitations Law Blog

Updates on key developments on laws involving limitation periods in Ontario.

open menu close menu

Limitations Law Blog

  • Home
  • About us

When Does a Claimant Know About Damages in a Solicitor’s Negligence Claim?

By Ara Basmadjian and Nicole Tzannidakis
April 25, 2022
  • Discoverability
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In Georgian Properties Corporation v. Robins Appleby LLP, 2022 ONCA 245, the Court of Appeal for Ontario confirmed that in a solicitor’s negligence claim involving the preparation of legal documents, a plaintiff’s knowledge of injury, loss, or damage under section 5(1)(a)(i) of the Limitations Act, 2002, SO 2002, c 24, Sch B (the “Limitations Act”) “will not generally turn on compliance by third parties with their obligations under documents or instruments prepared by the solicitor.” Rather, in such a case, “the question of whether injury, loss or damage has occurred must turn on matters such as the validity and enforceability of the documents and instruments that were prepared.”

The defendant lawyers were retained by a developer to prepare various disclosure documents in respect of a condominium project. When the condominium was turned over to the unit holders in April 2010, the condominium corporation refused to pay the two mortgages and the promissory note. In 2011, the condominium corporation commenced an action against the developer and alleged, among other things, that the debt instruments were null and void as they were oppressive and did not comply with the Condominium Act, 1998, SO 1998, c 19 (the “Condominium Act”).

The condominium corporation challenged the adequacy of the disclosure documents in a factum delivered in June 2017. Justice Akbarali refused to strike those portions of the factum on July 7, 2017. In May 2018, Justice Akbarali determined that the disclosure documents were inadequate, that the two mortgages and the promissory note were oppressive, and that the promissory note also breached the Condominium Act.

By statement of claim issued on November 19, 2019, Georgian Properties Corporation (“Georgian Properties”), as the successor to the developer, sued the lawyers for negligence in the preparation of the disclosure documents. Justice Dow summarily dismissed the action as statute barred under the Limitations Act. According to the motion judge, Georgian Properties knew that it had suffered a loss in April 2010 when the condominium corporation refused to pay the debt instruments and knew no later than July 7, 2017 that it had a claim against the lawyers for which a proceeding was the appropriate remedy.

The Court of Appeal overturned the motion judge’s decision on the basis that his erroneous finding that Georgian Properties was suffering a loss when the condominium corporation failed to pay the debt instruments “skewed his analysis of when Georgian Properties ought to have discovered its injury, loss or damage.”

The allegations of solicitor’s negligence were first made in a factum delivered several years after the action had been started. Yet, the mere allegation of solicitor’s negligence is not enough to automatically start the clock under section 5(1) of the Limitations Act. The analysis must be more nuanced. As the Court of Appeal recognized, “[f]urther investigation and assessment may be required. To hold otherwise could lead to costly and unnecessary litigation.” In the result, the Court of Appeal held that it was unreasonable for Georgian Properties to draw a plausible inference of liability against the lawyers before November 19, 2017.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Ara Basmadjian

About Ara Basmadjian

Ara Basmadjian is a Partner in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution group at Dentons Canada LLP. His practice involves a variety of complex corporate, commercial and civil litigation matters. Ara has particular experience in cases involving commercial contracts, negligence, product liability, class actions, competition law, cannabis in Canada, and extraordinary remedies, such as injunctions.

All posts Full bio

Nicole Tzannidakis

About Nicole Tzannidakis

Nicole Tzannidakis is an associate in the Litigation & Dispute Resolution group of the Dentons Toronto office. Her experience includes advising clients on a broad variety of litigation and arbitration matters, with a focus on corporate and commercial disputes.

All posts

RELATED POSTS

  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Application of the appropriate means test in an action to enforce a foreign judgment

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"

Supreme Court of Canada determines that limitation period contained in s. 36(4)(a)(i) of the Competition Act is subject to discoverability

By Dentons Limitations Law Group
  • Discoverability

Court of Appeal affirms the importance of the “appropriate means” test under s. 5(1)(a)(iv)

By Dentons Limitations Law Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Acknowledgment
  • Adding a Party
  • Amending Pleadings
  • Attempted Resolution
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • COVID-19
  • Demand Obligations
  • Discoverability
  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • General
  • Limitation Periods contained in "Other Acts"
  • Limitation Periods in Federal Court
  • Misnomer
  • Motions to Strike
  • Notable cases in other provinces
  • Special Circumstances
  • Statutory Variation of Time Limits
  • Successors
  • Tolling/Varying Agreements
  • Transitional Provisions
  • Ultimate Limitation Periods

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site